Implementation of Project-Based Learning Model in Lathe Machining Technique Subjects to Improve Student Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Pres Megari Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Mulianti Mulianti Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Yufrizal A Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/meej.v1i2.21

Keywords:

Learning Model, Project Based Learning, Learning Outcomes, Lathe Machine

Abstract

Education is the most critical point in the perfection of learning, one of which is the learning model given to students. Learning outcomes are an aspect of achievement in a student's success in the classroom. Especially in student test scores conducted at the end of the semester exam shows the ability of students who have not obtained the minimum completeness value limit (KKM), so it can assume the acquisition of the results of the learning value of Lathe Machining class XI TP A at SMK Dhuafa Padang is still not as desired. This research was conducted through classroom action research. The research subject is the XI grade machining engineering students with 20 students. The research was conducted in May-June 2023 and had two cycles. This research instrument uses multiple choice test questions for the cognitive level and project observation sheets at the psychomotor level. The results of the observation of cycle one and cycle 2 prove the increase in student learning outcomes with an increase between cycles. The implementation of the first cycle obtained a score of 66.67 which increased to 78.13 in the second cycle. The percentage of classical Completeness in cycle 1 obtained a value of 60%, and there was an increase in cycle 2 to 85%. The research success indicator set is 75 with 75% classical completeness. Therefore, there is a conclusion that applying project-based learning in Lathe Machining Engineering subjects can develop motivation and improve student learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akimov, N., Kurmanov, N., Uskelenova, A., & Aidargaliyeva, N. (2023). Components of education 4.0 in open innovation competence frameworks: Systematic review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100037

Alam, A. (2022). Employing Adaptive Learning and Intelligent Tutoring Robots for Virtual Classrooms and Smart Campuses: Reforming Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 914, 395–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2980-9_32/COVER

Azorín, C. (2020). Beyond COVID-19 supernova. Is another education coming? Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3–4), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0019/FULL/XML

Bhaduri, S., Biddy, Q., Elliott, C. H., Jacobs, J., Rummel, M., Ristvey, J., Sumner, T., & Recker, M. (2022). Co-designing a rural research practice partnership to design and support STEM pathways for rural youth. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 12(2), 45–70. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2022.v12n2p45-70

Chuang, S. (2021). The Applications of Constructivist Learning Theory and Social Learning Theory on Adult Continuous Development. Performance Improvement, 60(3), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21963

Daskan, A., & Yildiz, Y. (2020). Blended Learning: A Potential Approach to Promote Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 7(4), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i4p103

De La Torre, E. M., Perez-Encinas, A., & Gomez-Mediavilla, G. (2022). Fostering Sustainability through Mobility Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031349

Ekpenyong, J. A., Owan, V. J., Ogar, J. O., Undie, J. A., Ekpenyong, J. A., Owan, V. J., Ogar, J. O., & Undie, J. A. (2022). Hierarchical linear modelling of educational outcomes in secondary schools: What matters-teachers’ or administrators’ input? Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2133491

Farooq, R., Zhang, Z., Talwar, S., & Dhir, A. (2022). Do green human resource management and self-efficacy facilitate green creativity? A study of luxury hotels and resorts. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(4), 824–845. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1891239

Geng, S., & Law, K. M. Y. (2019). Investigating self-directed learning and technology readiness in blending learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(17), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0147-0

Hanif, M. (2020). The development and effectiveness of motion graphic animation videos to improve primary school students’ sciences learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13416a

Hernández, M., Antonio, D. M., Guevara, V., Carlos, J., Martínez, T., Hernández, D., Ruben, A., & Menendez, M. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals , best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8

Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing Design Education for the 21st Century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.12.002

Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13112

Qadir, J., & Al-fuqaha, A. (2020). A Student Primer on How to Thrive in Engineering Education during and beyond COVID-19. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090236

Ratajczak, M. Z., & Ratajczak, J. (2020). Extracellular microvesicles/exosomes: discovery, disbelief, acceptance, and the future? Leukemia, 3126–3135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01041-z

Syahril, Purwantono, Wulansari, R. E., Nabawi, R. A., Safitri, D., & Kiong, T. T. (2022). The Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning On 4Cs Skills of Vocational Students in Higher Education. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 14(3), 29–37. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2022.14.03.003

Syahril, S., Nabawi, R. A., & Safitri, D. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of the Project Based on the Potential of their Region: A Project-based Learning Implementation. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(2), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.1153

Syauqi, K., Munadi, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Students’ perceptions toward vocational education on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 881–886. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20766

Yasmin, M., Naseem, F., & Masso, I. C. (2019). Studies in Educational Evaluation Teacher-directed learning to self-directed learning transition barriers in Pakistan. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.02.003

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31

How to Cite

Megari, P., Mulianti, M., & A, Y. (2023). Implementation of Project-Based Learning Model in Lathe Machining Technique Subjects to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. Mechanical Engineering Education Journal, 1(2), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.24036/meej.v1i2.21

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Regular Issue

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Pres Megari, Mulianti Mulianti, Yufrizal A

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.