Student's perceptions on choosing CAD software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24036/meej.v1i3.31Keywords:
CAD, Student's Perception, Mechanical EngineeringAbstract
AutoCAD skills are often an obstacle for college graduates when entering the world of work. This research was carried out to see the perceptions of D3 Mechanical Engineering FT UNP students regarding AutoCAD. This research is descriptive research, with a total sampling method of 40 D3 Engineering FT UNP students who have taken CAD/CAM courses on 27 May 2024 – 27 June 2024. The data used in this research is Primary Data taken by distributing Google Forms. The research results show that in general student perceptions are at a fairly good level (70%). If we look at each indicator, in the Usage indicator, student perceptions are at the Fairly Good level (73%). In the Usability indicator, student perceptions are at a very good level (93%). In the Satisfaction indicator, student perceptions are at a very good level (93%). In the Constraints indicator, student perceptions are at a bad level (45%). In terms of preference indicators, student perceptions are at a very good level (90%).
Â
Downloads
References
Abdul Majid. (2008). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arief Sadiman dkk. (2012). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Asep Jihat dan Abdul Haris. (2008). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.
Azhar Arsyad. (2002). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Raja Persada.
Budi Arianto. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil belajar pada Mata Pelajaran Gambar Teknik Kelas X Teknik Gambar Bangunan SMK Negeri 3 Semarang. Laporan Penelitian. Semarang: FT UNNES.
Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional .Jakarta.
Nana Sudjana. (2010). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ngalim Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar
Oemar Hamalik. (1983). Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan-Kesulitan Belajar. Bandung: Tarsito.
Oemar hamalik. (2011). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara
Saifudin Azwar. (2009). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sardiman A.M. (2012). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Wahyu Widhiarso. (2009). Mengestimasi reliabilitas. Jurnal : SPSS untuk Psikologi, 5:15-17
Winkel, W.S. (1996). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Indra Wita, Eko Indrawan, Irzal Irzal, Junil Adri, Primawati Primawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Verenza Delfira, Primawati Primawati, Rizky Ema Wulansari, Sri Rizki Putri Primandari, Implementation learning media based on fliphtml5 on students’ learning outcomes on basic welding , Mechanical Engineering Education Journal: Vol. 1 No. 4 (2023): Regular Issue