Student's perceptions on choosing CAD software

Authors

  • Indra Wita Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Eko Indrawan Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Irzal Irzal Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Junil Adri Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA
  • Primawati Primawati Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, INDONESIA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24036/meej.v1i3.31

Keywords:

CAD, Student's Perception, Mechanical Engineering

Abstract

AutoCAD skills are often an obstacle for college graduates when entering the world of work. This research was carried out to see the perceptions of D3 Mechanical Engineering FT UNP students regarding AutoCAD. This research is descriptive research, with a total sampling method of 40 D3 Engineering FT UNP students who have taken CAD/CAM courses on 27 May 2024 – 27 June 2024. The data used in this research is Primary Data taken by distributing Google Forms. The research results show that in general student perceptions are at a fairly good level (70%). If we look at each indicator, in the Usage indicator, student perceptions are at the Fairly Good level (73%). In the Usability indicator, student perceptions are at a very good level (93%). In the Satisfaction indicator, student perceptions are at a very good level (93%). In the Constraints indicator, student perceptions are at a bad level (45%). In terms of preference indicators, student perceptions are at a very good level (90%).

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Majid. (2008). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arief Sadiman dkk. (2012). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Asep Jihat dan Abdul Haris. (2008). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo.

Azhar Arsyad. (2002). Media Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT. Raja Persada.

Budi Arianto. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil belajar pada Mata Pelajaran Gambar Teknik Kelas X Teknik Gambar Bangunan SMK Negeri 3 Semarang. Laporan Penelitian. Semarang: FT UNNES.

Depdiknas. (2003). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional .Jakarta.

Nana Sudjana. (2010). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Ngalim Purwanto. (2013). Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

Oemar Hamalik. (1983). Metode Belajar dan Kesulitan-Kesulitan Belajar. Bandung: Tarsito.

Oemar hamalik. (2011). Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara

Saifudin Azwar. (2009). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sardiman A.M. (2012). Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Wahyu Widhiarso. (2009). Mengestimasi reliabilitas. Jurnal : SPSS untuk Psikologi, 5:15-17

Winkel, W.S. (1996). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo

Downloads

Published

2023-08-31

How to Cite

Wita, I., Indrawan, E., Irzal, I., Adri, J., & Primawati, P. (2023). Student’s perceptions on choosing CAD software. Mechanical Engineering Education Journal, 1(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.24036/meej.v1i3.31

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>